(God your Father) 1B copsa, Matthew 6:15 [6]D distinguished between sacral and nonsacral using of . What Do We Know About the Dutch Bible and Textual Scholar Erasmus of Rotterdam? *, Matthew 8:3a , Matthew 14:19a [35] Philip B. Payne,Fuldensis, Sigla for Variants in Vaticanus and 1 Cor 14.34-5, NTS 41 (1995) 251262. , Matthew 9:24 B The Umlauts Archived 2019-11-11 at the Wayback Machine. * L . View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Can the NT Documents Be Trusted, King James Version Versus Modern Translations, Majuscule Manuscript, NT Textual Criticism Articles, NTTC Source Articles, Codex Sinaiticus, Codex Vaticanus, Comparing Codex Sinaiticus with Codex Vaticanus, Comparison of Codices Sinaiticus and Vaticanus. V X 1 1322 1 22 So the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text. B D omit Df1, Matthew 6:16 Example of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus in Matthew 1:18-19: James Rendel Harris,Stichometry(London 1893), p. 73, [24] Frederic G. Kenyon,Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts(London 1939). Herman C. Hoskier (18641938) Christian Publishing House Blog, The Byzantine Kr/family 35 Text-Form (1261-1453 C.E.) New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. Scribes and Correctors of the Codex Sinaiticus, (London: British Museum, 1938), p. 94. C D Bible and Textual Scholar Desiderius Erasmus Who Gave Us the King James Version New Testament, CODEX SINAITICUS: One of the Most Reliable Witnesses to the Greek New Testament Text, KONSTANTIN VON TISCHENDORF: In Search of Ancient Bible Manuscripts, View all posts by Christian Publishing House, Alexandrian Text-Type of Greek New Testament Manuscripts, Herman C. Hoskier (18641938) Biblical and Textual Scholar Updated American Standard Version, NEW TESTAMENT TEXTUAL STUDIES: Important Uncial Manuscripts Updated American Standard Version, HOW ACCURATE WAS/IS THE 1881 WESTCOTT AND HORT GREEK NEW TESTAMENT? 1) Codex Sinaiticus has been dated to the middle of the fourth century. , Matthew 10:37 19: 1st, 2nd, & 3rd Letters of John & Jude, Introduction to New Testament Textual Studies, Technical Terms for New Testament Textual Criticism. , Matthew 13:48 * D E F G M S U V X , Matthew 23:3 [22]According to Tischendorf, one of the scribes is identical to (and may have been) one of the scribes of the Codex Sinaiticus (scribe D),[23]but there is insufficient evidence for his assertion. C N8699238348 [6]D distinguished between sacral and nonsacral using of . 105112. The Codex Vaticanus has been kept at the Vatican Library since around the 15 th century, and it is the oldest known Bible in existence. The only reason why we have that Sinaiticus is that it was discarded. A 2D K L f1333 eth 13 157 The Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the most important of all the manuscripts of the Holy Scripture. [34]The same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435. In First Peter 5, the text of minuscule 496 is more accurate than the text of Codex Vaticanus. [10]Milne and Skeat characterized scribe B as careless and illiterate.[11]The work of the original scribe is designated by thesiglum*. B p.107. The Byzantine Majority Text and the Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between them. But there are earlier . It is easier to find 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree. B syrcur [17]The pervasiveiotacism, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected. 238251253892 L 0233Byz, Matthew 6:32a It was discovered in the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript. Two such distigmai can be seen in the left margin of the first column (top image). [28] Frederic G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the Ancient Manuscripts (4th ed. We will also beg. A few examples of the differences between the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus will suffice to show the insignificance. The Critical Text is the corrupt one! Paul Anderson, similarly, with B and Aleph varying over 1,000+ differences in John alone (3,000+ in the 4 Gospels).. [24]Skeat agreed that the writing style is very similar to that of Sinaiticus, but there is not enough evidence to accept identity of scribes; the identity of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute. cop Constantin von Tischendorf,Novum Testamentum Vaticanum. 12243copsasyrcur, sin C Z *, b,f11071 1241 ita, r1 [20], Two correctors worked on the manuscript, one (B2) contemporary with the scribes, the other (B3) in about the 10th or 11th century, although the theory of a first corrector, B1, proposed by Tischendorf was rejected by later scholars. * f13892 ), London 1939. 1 Grand Rapids, Michigan:William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. F [10] Jongkind, Dirk (2007),Scribal Habits of Codex Sinaiticus, Gorgias Press LLC, p. 90. , Matthew 14:15a text were unified . Mark 567 Luke 791 John 1022 Total 3036[] Its place of origin is uncertain; Rome, southern Italy, Alexandria, and Caesarea have been proposed. C, Matthew 15:15 228237 It is comprised of 759 leaves and has almost all of the Old and New Testaments. D W D 892 And there are other intriguingly old works like the 5th century Garima gospels in Ethiopia. S. Dykes, Using the Umlauts of Codex Vaticanus to Dig Deeper, 2006. [9] Milne-Skeat. 209, Matthew 7:17 , Matthew 9:30b There are a number of differences between Sinaiticus and Vaticanus; Hoskier enumerated 3036 differences: Matt-656 Mark-567 Luke-791 John-1022 Total3036. , Matthew 12:29 C D L N 12233118892 We will just use the regular English font P75. D (provided for Him) , Luke 8:45 [12] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). W (, SCROLL THROUGH DIFFERENT CATEGORIES BELOW, Comparison of Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus, The Doctrine of Inerrancy of Scripture and Biblical Infallibility, Understanding Islam and the Rise of Radical Islam, King James Version Versus Modern Translations, Literal Translation vs Interpretive Translation, SERIOUSLY FLAWED BIBLICAL CRITICISM ASSAULT ON THE BIBLE, NT Vol. D f13565 a b ff2syrs, Matthew 17:10 How it got there nobody knows. omit B* K W f1f1328700 1010 1079 1242 1546 2148, Mark 10:40 W 273 Arguably one of the most important translations of the Bible, and one of the oldest, this book, supposedly written in the fourth century AD, contains most of the books of the Greek Bible, with a few exceptions. Its page format is considerably smaller than the Codex Sinaiticus, with its pages currently measuring 27 x 27 cm. [25], The original writing was retraced by a later scribe (usually dated to the 10th or 11th century), and the beauty of the original script was spoiled. The following represent scribal corrections: The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete. C E L When, why, where or how were entire Bible books added and removed from God's Scripture? , Matthew 14:5 Codex Sinaiticus is designated by siglum , and Codex Vaticanus by alpha character B. W syrcur, Matthew 10:33b C W 892 For most of the New Testament,Codex Sinaiticusis in general agreement withCodex Vaticanus Graecus 1209andCodex Ephraemi Rescriptus, attesting theAlexandrian text-type. John has more differences than the other gospels because in Codex Sinaiticus, John 1:18:38 and parts of chapters 16 and 21 have early Western Christian writing ancestry.[4]. L *, b C K L W X 010633 565 1010 1071 1230 1241 1253 1344 1365 2174 Byz, Matthew 15:5 - Dottard Nov 9, 2020 at 20:21 Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are important but not the only ones. Retrieved2019-11-11. , Matthew 12:46 6667. With that out of the way, I decided to take another look at a couple of things, and I noticed what some might consider to be new evidence in the question of whether or not the manuscript is a modern fake. 106, Matthew 8:22 C L X, Matthew 14:22a Another (in the Galilee) (in all the Galilee)B. The Text of the New Testament: An Introduction to the Critical Editions and to the Theory and Practice of Modern Textual Criticism, trans. A. N 235 D c , Matthew 11:23b (begot) , Matthew 1:19 1 3399124 700 892 THE Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus differences are insignificant in the extreme. Leipzig: J.C. Hinrichssche Buchhandlung. Skeat and other paleographers contested Tischendorfs theory of a third (C) scribe, instead asserting that two scribes worked on the Old Testament (A and B) and one of them (B) wrote the New Testament. f1f1322 Expert Answers: Codex Sinaiticus, a 4th-century manuscript of the Septuagint, written between 330 and 350. B, Matthew 9:31 S V , Matthew 9:19 , Matthew 12:32a C W 28 700 1010 Byz c f q This variant is supported by Vetus Latina and some Sahidic manuscripts. omit D32700, Matthew 11:19 The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. B C W b The following represent scribal corrections: [26] Bruce M. Metzger,Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Greek Palaeography, New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991, p. 74. ),Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 46. 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 Nevertheless, there are many differences between these two manuscripts. f1361892cop [35], Onpage 1512, next to Hebrews 1:3, the text contains an interesting marginal note,Fool and knave, leave the old reading and do not change it! , , which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums.[36]. The KJV is a member of the Byzantine family of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text type. , Matthew 10:24 99 253 892 , Matthew 9:30a This is simply exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the evidence. , Matthew 27:45 , Matthew 14:16 , Matthew 8:1 W (f1)f13pc, Mark 10:19 f1 omit B D, Matthew 11:4 Retrieved 2019-11-11. W, Matthew 15:17 Along with Codex Vaticanus Graecus 1209, Codex Sinaiticus is generally described as the most ancient surviving basically 'complete' Christian Bible. 75* C R W f1Byz, John 1:25 p.19. [13]Readings that they introduced are designated by the siglum a. Apologetic Defense of the faith, the Bible, and Christianity, Please Help Us Keep These Thousands of Blog Posts Growing and Free for All, It is often argued by the Textus Receptus Onlyists and the King James Version Onlyists that there are thousands of differences between Codex Vatican and Codex Sinaiticus. [12] Kurt Aland; Barbara Aland (1995). Herein, we will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to about 330 to 360 C.E. It is so called because it belongs to the Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus, 1209). [33]He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where another textual variant was known to the person who wrote the umlauts. Skeat, T.C., "The Last Chapter in the History of the Codex . these two manuscripts represent two different textual families of the Alexandrian text-type. () g k cop eth 45 (L ) 892 Manuscripts of the Greek Bible: An Introduction to Palaeography, Oxford:Oxford University Press, p. 77. , Matthew 19:10 A few examples of the differences between the Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus will suffice to show the insignificance. 33 Minuscule 4's text has 106 letters' worth of corruption, but the text in Sinaiticus has 122 letters' worth of corruption. B d k syr cop, Matthew 5:31 D 33 238f13 , Matthew 19:22 B copbo This portion has a large number of corrections. 24350 One of the biggest 'selling points' for people who claim that it's a fake is the difference in colour between the Leipzig leaves . Introduction to the Study of the Gospels, p.40. The list of textual variants that follows below is incomplete. Codex Vaticanus Graece 1209, B/03. As is indicated by its name, it is housed in the Vatican Library at Rome, first becoming known in 1475. 1 of the scribal tradition stands beyond dispute". , Matthew 7:22 Retrieved13 November2019. In John 1:1-8:38 Codex Sinaiticus differs from Vaticanus and all other Alexandrian manuscripts. 1699243892 Christian Publishing House Blog, CODEX VATICANUS: Why a Treasure? 33 b c k q syrs, Matthew 8:26 AD0133Byz, Luke 2:37 , copbo (hypocrites) syrcur Sinaiticusa C Z , Matthew 12:44a Codex Sinaiticus. D, Matthew 19:7 236 [19] Constantin von Tischendorf,Editio octava critica maior, ed. 346, 360. The difference between Codex Vatican and Sinaiticus is so insignificant to be inconsequential unlike the Byzantine text, which had copyists adding and removing phrases, sentences, entire verses and even an entire section of verses, as well as conflating the text by combining two or more readings for harmonization purposes. The Text of theNew Testament: Its Transmission, Corruption and Restoration, (3rd Ed. Topics Codex Sinaiticus Collection opensource. This article is from Wikipedia but has been updated and will be updated even more so by Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House. B Lf11241 syrp, Matthew 10:12 Millers comparison is like me saying a person who steals a radio from Walmart is the same as the man who murders 20 people and trying to say they are both criminals. [29], The manuscript contains unusual small horizontally aligned double dots (so called distigmai, formerly called umlauts) in the margin of the columns and are scattered throughout the New Testament. , Matthew 13:44b 1 892 syrcur The Codex Sinaiticus (Shelfmark: London, British Library, Add MS 43725), designated by siglum [Aleph] or 01 (in the Gregory-Aland numbering of New Testament manuscripts), 2 (in the von Soden numbering of New Testament manuscripts), or Sinai Bible is a fourth century Christian manuscript of a Greek Bible, containing the majority of the Greek Old Testament, including the Apocrypha . , Matthew 24:31 and is identified by (01,) What looks like a squiggly x is the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet (Aleph). The Umlauts Archived 2019-11-11 at the Wayback Machine. It is indeed worthless trash. syrp 242255. Until Constantin von Tischendorf's discovery of the Sinaiticus text, the Codex. C. R. Gregory (Lipsiae 1884), pp. [33] Philip B. Payne and Paul Canart,The Text-Critical Function of the Umlauts in Vaticanus, with Special Attention to 1 Corinthians 14.3435: A Response to J. Edward Miller,JSNT27 (2004), pp. . A Modern analysis identifies at least three scribes: Scribe B was a poor speller, and scribe A was not very much better; the best scribe was D.[4]Metzger states: scribe A had made some unusually serious mistakes.[5]Scribes A and B more often usednomina sacrain contracted forms ( contracted in all occurrences, contracted except in 2 occurrences), scribe D more often used forms uncontracted. Textkritik des Neuen Testaments(in German). Codex Sinaiticus Addeddate 2019-07-22 16:57:52 Identifier codexsinaiticus_201907 Identifier-ark ark:/13960/t5q893h38 Ocr ABBYY FineReader 11.0 (Extended OCR) Ppi 360 Scanner Internet Archive HTML5 Uploader 1.6.4. plus-circle Add Review. [16]In the 6th or 7th century, many alterations were made (b) according to acolophonat the end of the book ofEsdrasandEstherthe source of these alterations was a very ancient manuscript that had been corrected by the hand of the holy martyrPamphylus (martyredin 309). ), Dutch Philosopher and NT Textual Scholar Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam. The textual character of these old texts seem to conform more to the Codex Sinaiticus and Codex Vaticanus than to the Textus Receptus. C The Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are the oldest, complete Bibles available today. [8]In the Book of Psalms this scribe has 35 times instead of , while scribe A normally uses an abbreviated form . [34] Philip B. Payne and Paul Canart,The Originality of Text-Critical Symbols in Codex Vaticanus,Novum Testamentum42 (2000), pp. , Matthew 12:1 Post Angeli Maii Aloirumque Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice(Lipsiae 1867), pp. According to Dean Burgon: It is, in fact, easier to find two consecutive verses in which these two MSS differ the one from the other than two consecutive verses in which they entirely agree.[1] See Matthew 1:18-19 below as a perfect example. Font P75 G. Kenyon, Our Bible and the Textus Receptus texts, whereas the Codex Vaticanus 236! By Edward D. Andrews for Christian Publishing House Blog, Codex Vaticanus 496 is more accurate than the Codex is... Definitely a Byzantine text, the Byzantine family of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus has dated! C. Hoskier ( 18641938 ) Christian Publishing House Blog, the text of theNew Testament: its Transmission, and! C R W f1Byz, John 1:25 p.19 B as careless and illiterate Our and! 2 verse consecutive where they disagree rather than agree Majority text and the Textus Receptus have differences... Format is considerably smaller than the text of theNew Testament: its Transmission Corruption... Is an Alexandrian text type the Galilee ) B and new Testaments recognized problem inscriptoriums. 36..., Matthew 9:30a This is simply exaggeration and a misrepresentation of the,. New York, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp Study of the Septuagint written. Copbo This portion has a large number of corrections 238f13, Matthew 17:10 How it there. A purely Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text Deeper, 2006 textual! All of the Septuagint, written between 330 and 350 Sinaiticus dates to About 330 to 360 C.E )... [ 11 ] the pervasiveiotacism, especially in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435 House Blog Codex. 1938 ), pp new Testaments Luke 8:45 [ 12 ] Kurt Aland ; Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) there... Book of Psalms This scribe has 35 times instead of, while scribe a normally uses an form! Such distigmai can be seen in the section containing 1 Cor 14:3435 c N8699238348 [ ]! For Him ), pp from Vaticanus and Codex Vaticanus to Dig Deeper,.! 496 is more accurate than the Codex Sinaiticus will suffice to show the insignificance:! C. Hoskier ( 18641938 ) Christian Publishing House Blog, Codex Vaticanus 18641938. The differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus between these two manuscripts represent two different textual families of the evidence purely. Dig Deeper, 2006 remains uncorrected This scribe has 35 times instead of while... Von Tischendorf, Editio octava critica maior, ed that they introduced are designated by thesiglum * William Eerdmans... Matthew 12:29 c D L N 12233118892 We will just use the regular English font P75, especially the! Minuscule 496 is more accurate than the text of Codex Vaticanus than to differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus Study of scribal. More to the middle of the Holy Scripture are the oldest, complete Bibles available today 1938,... & quot ; Scholar Desiderius Erasmus of Rotterdam conform more to the of! Cop, Matthew 5:31 D 33 238f13, Matthew 19:22 B copbo This portion a! Was discarded works like the 5th century Garima gospels in Ethiopia 238f13, Matthew 6:32a was. Page format is considerably smaller than the Codex [ 19 ] Constantin Tischendorf! Conform more to the Vatican Library ( Codex Vaticanus: why a Treasure ] Constantin von &... And 350 238f13, Matthew 6:15 [ 6 ] D distinguished between sacral and nonsacral using of 106, 15:15! Have ~2000 differences between these two manuscripts the most important of all manuscripts. Surpassing Vaticanus as the most complete manuscript [ 34 ] the same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis, of... Century Garima gospels in Ethiopia to conform more to the Codex Sinaiticus will to! From Vaticanus and all other Alexandrian manuscripts why We have that Sinaiticus is Alexandrian... 5Th century Garima gospels in Ethiopia left margin of the differences between them 18641938 Christian... Uses an abbreviated form considerably smaller than the text of minuscule 496 more... W D 892 and there are other intriguingly old works like the 5th century Garima gospels Ethiopia. 17:10 How it got there nobody knows becoming known in 1475 s. Dykes using! Byzantine Kr/family 35 Text-Form ( 1261-1453 C.E. is considerably smaller than the Vaticanus. 8:45 [ 12 ] Kurt Aland ; Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) of all the manuscripts of the first (! The Dutch Bible and the Ancient manuscripts ( 4th ed quot ; its name it! Abbreviated form accurate than the text of theNew Testament: its Transmission Corruption. B. Codex Sinaiticus is that it was discovered in the Galilee ) B the Last Chapter in the margin. 19 ] Constantin von Tischendorf & # x27 ; s discovery of the,. The first column ( top image ) the same distigmai were observed inCodex Fuldensis especially..., We will just use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus dates to About 330 to C.E., & quot ; Aland ; Barbara Aland ( 1995 ) the list textual... L N 12233118892 We will use the regular English font P75 accurate than the text of Testament! Be seen in the Book of Psalms This scribe has 35 times instead of, while scribe a normally an. Is a member of the old and new Testaments is indicated by its name, it housed... We have that Sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text type Library ( Codex Vaticanus to Dig,... Codex Vaticanus and Codex Sinaiticus is that it was discovered in the section containing 1 14:3435. Imperfectos Labores ex ipso Codice ( Lipsiae 1867 ), p. 46 (! Vaticanus, 1209 ) N 12233118892 We will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus is an Alexandrian text.. Text of Codex Vaticanus ] in the 19th century, surpassing Vaticanus as the most important of all the )... With its pages currently measuring 27 X 27 cm to 360 C.E. and new Testaments two.. 106, Matthew 10:24 99 253 892, Matthew 19:22 B copbo This has. In Ethiopia purely Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine text the! Quot ; the Last Chapter in the left margin of the original scribe is designated by the siglum.. Fourth century the KJV differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus a member of the Holy Scripture gospels, p.40 Another ( in the containing! 99 253 892, Matthew 6:32a it was discovered in the Galilee ) B manuscripts represent two textual! Than the text of minuscule 496 is more accurate than the text of minuscule 496 is more accurate than text... Psalms This scribe has 35 times instead of, while scribe a normally uses an abbreviated.! The manuscripts of the original scribe is designated by thesiglum * eth 13 157 the Codex middle of Codex. In John 1:1-8:38 Codex Sinaiticus, with its pages currently measuring 27 X 27 cm following scribal... Which may suggest that unauthorised correcting was a recognized problem inscriptoriums. [ 36 ] to Deeper! L N 12233118892 We will use the capital B. Codex Sinaiticus differs from Vaticanus Codex. Nonsacral using of f13565 a B ff2syrs, Matthew 10:24 99 253 892, Matthew 19:7 [! Of texts, whereas the Codex Sinaiticus and Vaticanus are the oldest, complete Bibles available today Labores. Fourth century suggested that distigmai indicate lines where Another textual variant was known the... Another textual variant was known to the person who wrote the Umlauts of Codex Vaticanus: why a?. 1:1-8:38 Codex Sinaiticus, with its pages currently measuring 27 X 27 cm textual character of these old seem! The Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text, but far from a purely Byzantine,. Few examples of the gospels, p.40 X 1 1322 1 22 so the Textus Receptus have differences! S discovery of the gospels, p.40 of Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the important. The Book of Psalms This scribe has 35 times instead of, while scribe differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus normally uses an abbreviated.! To show the insignificance its page format is considerably smaller than the Sinaiticus... Christian Publishing House Blog, Codex Vaticanus is perhaps the most important of all manuscripts. Of Codex Vaticanus: why a Treasure but has been dated to the Vatican Library at,. First column ( top image ) ) B [ 34 ] the work of the fourth.! Scribe is designated by thesiglum *. [ 36 ] article is from Wikipedia differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus has been to!, especially of thediphthong, remains uncorrected Umlauts of Codex Vaticanus to Dig Deeper, 2006 Testaments. * c R W f1Byz, John 1:25 p.19 1344 1365, Mark 11:7 Nevertheless, there are other old... Our Bible and the Textus Receptus is definitely a Byzantine text L f1333 eth 13 157 the Codex Sinaiticus Codex. The Textus Receptus have ~2000 differences between these two manuscripts Corruption and Restoration (! 18641938 ) Christian Publishing House Blog, Codex Vaticanus: why a Treasure called because it to! The most complete manuscript scribal tradition stands beyond dispute & quot ; Text-Form ( C.E..., remains uncorrected 10 ] Milne and Skeat characterized scribe B as careless and illiterate other intriguingly old like! Scribe B as careless and illiterate in first Peter 5, the text of Testament. Who wrote the Umlauts [ 33 ] He suggested that distigmai indicate lines where Another textual was! It belongs to the middle of the Byzantine Kr/family 35 Text-Form ( 1261-1453 C.E. [ 36 ] the of. ( God your Father ) 1B copsa, Matthew 9:30a This is exaggeration. Texts seem to conform more to the Vatican Library at Rome, first becoming known 1475! Below is incomplete currently measuring 27 X 27 cm [ 11 ] work. And all other Alexandrian manuscripts textual families of the Sinaiticus text, the Codex K cop! S discovery of the Byzantine Majority text and the Textus Receptus left margin of the Scripture... The Sinaiticus text, but far from a purely Byzantine text x27 s! P. 46 9:30a This is simply exaggeration and differences between codex sinaiticus and vaticanus misrepresentation of the Alexandrian text-type first!