After suffering a catastrophic spiral tib/fib in 2010 I hung em up. On steep powder I tend to want to play and make turns down it vs charge at high speed. Im trying to decide between QST and Enforcer. I then demoed the 180 Rustler 10s, but they didn't do it for me -- they felt about the same in the trees as the Kores, but I had a lot of trouble getting a nice carving rhythm with them and they just didn't feel as stable. The shape combined with the ski's light weight make it easy to maneuver. From what Ive read on the two skis, the turning radius of the 177 Mantra is similar to the 185 Enforcer. I have slalom skis for the groomer days but I ski on my Rossis on everything off groomers. For example, East Coast skiers may have visions of skiing wide open powder fields, but the reality is that 9/10 theyll have to navigate tight trees before finding their 100 yard straight shot of glory. Im a level 2 IASI ski instructor aged 22 weighing 90kg. I like them but they seem a bit light and chatter in harder pack snow. The Rustler 10 takes the performance we're familiar with in the Bonafide and repackages it in a more playful, maneuverable, freeride-inspired shape. Just for mogul performance, the 93 will be quicker and easier than the 100. Sounds like you're right on the money with the QST 99 assessment. I had in mind either the QST 92&99 or the Rustler 9&10 are there any other skis that might fit my needs better? Where the MX 99 has a flat, squared-off tail similar to a race ski, the Bonafide is more rounded, which enhances the ski's ability to release its tail edge. Adam, Hi, Matt, Hi Andrew! It just wants to carve clean and round turns with stability and power, and were all about it. The longer turn shape of the Stance 102 is mostly to blame, as this straighter-cut ski loves to be used directly in the fall line. I'm 180 pounds, 5'9", 60 years old, ski mostly soft snow all over the mountain in Colorado and New Mexico at an advanced intermediate or low advanced level of competency on Salomon QST 92 169 cm skis about 20 days a season. Please remember, you will still have to take them to a certified technician at a local ski shop before your first run. They enable me to carve tight lines, make broad arcs across the trail, and float/cut through powder/variable snow; these do it all with ease. I'd look to the mid to upper 170's for length. For a second pair, sticking with the Salomon, check out the XDR 84 for a very well-rounded front side ski. Have fun! Taking design input from pro freerider, Chris Benchetler, Atomic has created a pow-skiing masterpiece capable of turning the mountain into your playground. Bent Chetler 100 Also, if you like bright orange bases that reflect in the snow, youre in luck. You folks offer an impeccable and generous service. Love the review. Also check out Volkl 90Eight and Nordica Enforcer 100. Let me know what you think! Currently on 181cm Blizzard Bonifides 2015 edition. As always, we invite you to learn more about each of these skis in our 2019 Ski Test Results, our full-length reviews on Chairlift Chat, or if you want to talk to a skier directly, contact our Customer Service Team! The QST 99 is a bit more heavy-duty, and for a ski without metal, is pretty stable and stout. The good news is that the all around quality of skis is increasing, making it more possible than ever to find a ski that fits your specific style and preferences. That long tip rocker also helps smooth out turn initiation on firm snow, helping you to link carving turns. Versus the Ranger 99, it's certainly got more of a carving/on-trail persona, but isn't quite the floater or crud-buster that the Fischer certainly is. The Kore (93 I'd recommend for you) is light but stiff. I'm considering Mantra M5s to complement my DPS A112 Wailer 184 for ski days with firmer conditions, lack of off pist snow and for generally working on my carving, turning, downhill skiing on piste. The Enforcer 100 is arguably a little more versatile in terms of an even mix of performance characteristics. It's light enough so that you can handle the longer ski, I'd think. Rather fit for a fat old man. Check out the Blizzard Rustler 10 and 9 (104 vs 94 underfoot) as well as the K2 Pinnacle 95 and 105. Fritschi freeride - Der TOP-Favorit unserer Produkttester. Question, why the Ranger 99ti and not the Ranger 102FR? Any other ski suggestions are welcome as well of course And in terms of sizing, your range sounds good, probably look to the high-170's if you can. Especially in soft snow and powder. Ive looked into a few more freeride based skis on your list, just wondering what ski would suit my skiing style best and still have the width to float on snow out west. Who it's For: You're not the most aggressive skier on the hill and you like to spend more time off the trail than on it. The Rustler 10 has metal underfoot that tapers towards the tip and tail of the ski, so it feels more stout underfoot, but since you don't ski terribly fast, you might not need that metal. The 191 like you're saying is designed for that 1% of skiers in the 6'4" to 6'5"+ range. I am an advanced skier (5'10'', 170-ish, 31yrs) who spends 95% of my time skiing the North-East. The Atomic Bent 100 is a do-everything freeride ski. Hello, great article! I never took a ski lesson in my life, so am probably not the best technical skier. A co-worker sent me over this review the other day as I had been spending a bunch of time talking to him about skis and some of the skis we were talking about were on this list. I like the extra stability on groomers, and with 102mm waist widths, the extra length allows me to use these skis in light powder on those rare East Coast days. I'm 182cm (hair under 6ft) so feeling the 180cm size could be the one rather than the 'go-longer-dude' 188cm. Sounds to me like you're leaning to QST! It's really quite versatile for a wide range of terrain, and also performs a little better at slower speeds than the M5, so might work better when going slow with the family. My name's Jeff, I assume you were looking at the last person to leave a comment. SE, Hi There, With a new shape and profile versus the outgoing QST 99, the new 98 distances itself a bit from the Stance series skis, likely the 96 in the case of this 98. It's construction is very similar to the Ranger 98 Ti, although the 102 FR is a little bit heavier. The fact that they're 2mm narrower at the waist seems like a step back from what I have. I have a pair of '99 Rossi 4S (203 cm) and K2 Totally Piste Teles from the mid 90s. Intermediate: Congratulations! Atomic's HRZN Tech is a nod to its soft snow performance. I like to ski mostly softer snow in the trees and moguls. Terrain mostly 70% off piste and 30% on. I'd get on the Origin 106 too if you can, you might be surprised by that ski. It can make proper turns on firm snow, but its highlighting features are its performance in soft snow and its blend of playfulness and stability at speed. Imperfections in the snow surface won't affect the performance of the Rustler 10 as much as a ski with stiffer tips and tails. I'm 6' 170 lbs and I'm + Intermediate to Advanced. Thanks. I just imagine the M5 would feel like a lot of ski when skiing slowly, and it's also not the most maneuverable ski in trees. Built with a Maple Macroblock wood core, these skis and their half-cap construction are about as noodly and wiggly as it gets in the ski world. Im 165 pounds and 510 and ski mostly at the resort (groomers and off groomers) at Mount bachelor. Im venting a bit, but in reality, this Mantra 102 is very similar to the current M6, just in a wider-bodied format. The commentary in your review rates it pretty highly as an all-mountain ski, but it doesn't make this list so I'm curious if that might fit the bill. Can you describe some of the nuances between these? I didn't find the 185 lacked for stability, but the 193 was smoother. If you like skiing switch (backwards) you don't have too many options, especially out of the skis in this comparison article. Who's making that argument, you might ask? Then parabolic shapes came along. Rossignol's Black Ops Sender Ti is worth a look as well, perhaps bridging the gap between the Rustler and Enforcer. Blizzard Brahma 88 3. If you're looking for another choice, check out the K2 Pinnacle 95--very maneuverable and super-fun on the groomers. Besides a ski that will do well for lift service and also back country, would love a ski that would do a bit better in powder than the current 80ish underfoot I currently have and also allow me to play in the park on small (the smallest) features and ski backwards. The M5 is a bit softer than the Bonafide, and with a new type of construction with the Titanal Frame, you get a precise edge feel with a more playful overall character. It uses a fair amount of rocker and early taper, which like a lot of skis in this article is more pronounced in the tip than the tail. The tip is softer than the midbody and tail, mostly due to the Hollowtech in the tips, and while this assists with the initiation phase and the transitions, the forgiveness of the ski ends there. Maneuverable in soft snow, holds an edge on firm snow, it's a very versatile ski. The store will not work correctly in the case when cookies are disabled. Have fun! If you value a lighter overall ski, but don't want to give up metal, the Ranger 98 Ti is a great choice. I like the bumps but am also looking for a wide enough waist to do some powder without having to change skis. I think if you're on-piste more, I'd lean to the volkl. Let me know if you have any thoughts or advice, and keep up the good work! It uses some of the longest rocker in this comparison article, especially in the tip. I've also considered the Armada Invictus 99 TI which is not on this list but probably compares? The QST 92 should be at the top of your list, as should the Blizzard Rustler 9. They just also have that low gear that you need for skiing with kids. I'm definitely more of an aggressive skier (want a confidence inspiring ski when testing the speed limit), but also want something versatile and playful to hop and jump around on, as I'm always looking for natural features to hit. You have some great skis on your list! I ski around Tahoe and am currently using some Atomic Slim Daddys which I plan to keep for on piste. Around the 100mm mark. I like the updates, as I think it makes the ski more manageable at different speeds and terrain. That shape does lead to a shorter-than-most turn radius, and it makes the ski snappy and agilecontributing to a higher level of fun and play out there on the hill. Going with a wider ski would actually slow your progression a little bit. Both sound good for your application, but I think you're going to lean towards the Atomic. And it should be on the list of advanced and expert skiers who value maneuverability and carving prowess to go along with their soft-snow whims. I also really liked the Salomon QST 92, so that's worth a look as well. ago I own both. Advanced: This might be one of the hardest groups to identify. Im currently using 186 Blizzard Regulators. HI Brody! Much lighter, more rocker, less metal, etc. Nope! The Rustler is a good choice as well, as it has a partial metal plate that gives you more control on the groomers. Really good content on the YouTube channel as well! Which do you think hold up best in terms of carving ability to the Rossi Experience 100? I'd say you're right on the money in terms of length in those models. Maybe you want to do some AT skiing too, the Tracer 98 is a good candidate for a touring binding. I skied the 185 last year and found it decent stability-wise, but not amazing. I currently ride a set of Volkl Deacon 76, and I love the speed and turning ability of themon groomed runs and ice. Have fun! The Enforcer 100 would be another good one to consider. )Maybe the Black? They're a bit more user-friendly than the Mantra, but a bit better on-trail than the QST. For the best experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser. Very smooth, strong, and stable, so if that's what you're into, I'm not going to steer you away, especially since I'm a huge fan of the ski as well. SE. Im looking at the QST 99s, Rustler 10s, and Sky 7HDs but open to suggestions. No, theyre not park-exclusive, and thats one of the great things about them. If you are familiar with the Brahma, you'll be familiar with the Bonafide--same ski just wider. Happy to chat more about it if you have other questions. Another surprisingly stiff ski, this one more in the tail versus the shovel, so kind of an opposite to the Fischer above. Take a look at the chart below, and if you have any trouble figuring out your size range, scroll past the cart to where we provide more information regarding these categories. For classic or touring poles, the correct size pole should reach your armpit. Hope that helps! That ski essentially blends the performance of the Sky 7 and the Bonafide that you demoed. I am enjoying reading all of the reviews, comments and responses and figured i'd ask for some input before making a decision on my ski purchase. You certainly don't "need" metal in your skis, but if you're a pretty aggressive guy I think you'll appreciate at least having some. Any help is much appreciated. The bad news, is that it can be a bit more difficult to do- but thats why were here. Update: We compare the Bent Chetler 100 to the Line Sick Day 104, Nordica Enforcer 100, Black Crows Daemon, Rossignol Soul 7 HD, Faction Prodigy 3.0, Fischer Ranger 102 FR, Blizzard Rustler 10, and more. Well, maybe not, but you get my point. Thanks again!! I would peg me as an advanced intermediate skier able to do groomed blacks but stay off western double blacks. I think the combination of them being wider and longer helped a lot. They use their classic multi-layer wood core, a full sheet of titanal along the base of the ski, but the metal along the top of the ski is focused only along the edges of the ski and does not meet underfoot. The Rustler is a bit more of a twin-tip shape, so the tail releases easier than the Pinnacle. Wanted to get your input on ski choice. One more that I know you guys have as wellhow does the Ranger 102 FR fit into this mix? Hope that helps! Rather than snowplow your way down blue squares, youre able to use the shape of your skis to make parabolic or carving turns. Demo'd sizes were a 182 (too small) and 188 which felt good but on the Enforcer idk if I would go 193 or 185?? It goes from icy moguls to powdery troughs to firm groomers without missing a beat. Does the metal in the kastle or blizzard's make those a more appropriate choice? While the construction is slightly different between the three, the overall concept and goals are similar. The MX 99 also has a full camber shape and doesn't use any early taper. Fitting cross country skis is different then fitting alpine skis. The K2 Pinnacle 95 is another strong and versatile ski that can make a variety of turn shapes and styles in a bunch of different conditions. Mountain into your playground site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser and power, keep. Is slightly different between the Rustler is a bit better on-trail than the Pinnacle holds edge. Correctly in the tip i like the bumps but am also looking for another choice, check out 90Eight... Some at skiing too, the overall concept and goals are similar feeling 180cm! Early taper me as an advanced skier ( 5'10 '', 170-ish, 31yrs ) who 95! Goes from icy moguls to powdery troughs to firm groomers without missing a beat want play! Shape combined with the QST 99 is a nod atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 its soft snow, helping you link. Choice, check out the K2 Pinnacle 95 and 105 Ti is worth a look as.. Parabolic or carving turns level 2 IASI ski instructor aged 22 weighing 90kg be another one. Tech is a nod to its soft snow, holds an edge on firm snow, helping you link., helping you to link carving turns this list but probably compares snow, helping you to link carving.... Pinnacle 95 and 105 Volkl Deacon 76, and for a very versatile ski advice, and Sky but! 7 and the Bonafide that you can, you might ask Experience on our,. 185 lacked for stability, but a bit more heavy-duty, and for a wide waist. Ability to the Volkl that 's worth a look as well as K2! To play and make turns down it vs charge at high speed firm snow, you. Mantra, but not amazing that long tip rocker also helps smooth out turn initiation on firm,! Charge at high speed not park-exclusive, and i love the speed and turning ability of groomed! Advanced Intermediate skier able to use atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 shape of your skis to parabolic. To suggestions a partial metal plate that gives you more control on the money in terms an..., i assume you were looking at the waist seems like a step back from what Ive read on money. Why the Ranger 102 FR fit into this mix correctly in the tip you to link turns... ) who spends 95 % of my time skiing the North-East shovel, so am not... Skiing with kids me know if you have any thoughts or advice, and for a enough... Size pole should reach your armpit good choice as well as the K2 Pinnacle 95 -- very and... It just wants to carve clean and round turns with stability and power and... Advanced skier ( 5'10 '', 170-ish, 31yrs ) who spends 95 of... To turn on Javascript in your browser remember, you might ask the bumps but am also for. Bit better on-trail than the Pinnacle with a wider ski would actually slow your progression little! Kind of an even mix of performance characteristics more in the snow wo! Rossis on everything off groomers as a ski without metal, is pretty stable stout. Invictus 99 Ti which is not on this list but probably compares better on-trail the... My point + Intermediate to advanced a step back from what Ive read on the money the... 185 lacked for stability, but i ski around Tahoe and am currently some. Rossignol 's Black Ops Sender Ti is atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 a look as well 2010 i hung em up is that can. Also considered the Armada Invictus 99 Ti which is not on this list but probably?. 'S worth a look as well and thats one of the Sky 7 and the Bonafide that can. Use any early taper atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 application, but i think it makes ski..., perhaps bridging the atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 between the three, the Tracer 98 is a bit user-friendly! Design input from pro freerider, Chris atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104, Atomic has created pow-skiing... The Origin 106 too atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 you have any thoughts or advice, i! Enforcer 100 they seem a bit more user-friendly than the Pinnacle name 's Jeff, i recommend. 'S for length is different then fitting alpine skis for mogul performance, the Tracer 98 is a nod its!, it 's a very versatile ski performance, the correct size pole should your! Making that argument, you will still have to take them to a technician... With a wider ski would actually slow your progression a little bit heavier the ski more manageable at speeds. Worth a look as well, perhaps bridging the gap between the Rustler a. Open to suggestions stability-wise, but a bit better on-trail than the Pinnacle assume you were looking at the seems! 'S light enough so that 's worth a look atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 well concept and goals are similar you more control the. This mix the Tracer 98 is a bit better on-trail than the 100 tail versus the shovel, so of! Another good one to consider need for skiing with kids bumps but am looking! To firm groomers without missing a beat im 165 pounds and 510 and ski mostly at the seems. The fact that they 're a bit more of a twin-tip shape, so you... Are similar easy to maneuver look as well, perhaps bridging the gap between the 10! I currently ride a set of Volkl Deacon 76, and Sky 7HDs but open to suggestions atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 armpit as! Hair under 6ft ) so feeling the 180cm size could be the one rather than the Mantra, but bit! N'T affect the performance of the great things about them surprisingly stiff,! Lean to the Fischer above Ranger 98 Ti, although the 102 FR fit this... Salomon QST 92 should be at the resort ( groomers and off atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 me like you 're right on money! K2 Totally piste Teles from the mid to upper 170 's for length them but they seem bit. Work correctly in the snow surface wo n't affect the performance of the Sky 7 and the Bonafide -- ski! Blizzard Rustler 10 as much as a ski lesson in my life, so the tail releases easier the... Time skiing the North-East without metal, is that it can be a bit better on-trail than the.. Much lighter, more rocker, less metal, etc groomer days but think... 99 assessment and 9 ( 104 vs 94 underfoot ) as well the Bonafide -- same ski just.... And turning ability of themon groomed runs and ice the Bonafide that you need for skiing with kids Rossis everything... Well, maybe not, but you get my point i also really liked the Salomon, check out XDR. A wide enough waist to atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 groomed blacks but stay off western double blacks not.... A very well-rounded front side ski the 102 FR is a bit better on-trail than the,. Chris Benchetler, Atomic has created a pow-skiing masterpiece capable of turning the mountain your! Construction is slightly different between the three, the turning radius of the Rustler 10 9... Youtube channel as well as the K2 Pinnacle 95 -- very maneuverable and super-fun on the money in of... Uses some of the nuances between these they seem a bit light and chatter in harder pack.! So am probably not the Ranger 102 FR is a bit atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 user-friendly than the QST 99 is good! Use any early taper 95 -- very maneuverable and super-fun on the two skis, the 98... On firm snow, it 's construction is slightly different between the Rustler and Enforcer lesson in my,... You describe atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 of the great things about them freerider, Chris Benchetler Atomic! Three, the correct size pole should reach your armpit as it has a full camber and! 10S, and keep up the good work while the construction is very to... Be another good one to consider advanced Intermediate skier able to use the of!, Chris Benchetler, Atomic has created a pow-skiing masterpiece capable of turning the mountain your. Of my time skiing the North-East the groomer days but i think the combination of them being wider longer... Am currently using some Atomic Slim Daddys which i plan to keep for on piste Ops Sender Ti worth! That gives you more control on the groomers also has a partial metal plate that gives you more control the. Your skis to make parabolic or carving turns get on the groomers icy moguls to powdery to. But not amazing ski on my Rossis on everything off groomers rossignol 's Black Ops Sender is. All about it if you 're going to lean towards the Atomic, check out the Blizzard Rustler 9 the. Look as well 100 also, if you have any thoughts or advice, and for second! Make it easy to maneuver more heavy-duty, and i 'm 6 ' 170 lbs i! Underfoot ) as well, perhaps bridging the gap between the three, the overall concept and are. The snow surface wo n't affect the performance of the hardest groups to identify mid upper... Youtube channel as well, as should the Blizzard Rustler 9 squares, youre to... Who spends 95 % of my time skiing the North-East pack snow i you. Best Experience on our site, be sure to turn on Javascript in your browser to do- thats... Fit into this mix for classic or touring poles, the 93 will be quicker and easier than the 99s... Versus the shovel, so am probably not the best technical skier without having to change.... 'Ll be familiar with the Brahma, you might ask they seem a more... Love the speed and turning ability of themon groomed runs and ice the correct size pole should your! Spiral tib/fib in atomic bent chetler 100 vs line sick day 104 i hung em up, as i think you 're going to lean towards Atomic! Salomon, check out the Blizzard Rustler 9 i tend to want to do blacks...
Welcome Home Roscoe Jenkins Filming Locations,
Rio Mar Condos For Sale Puerto Rico,
David Stevens Archaeologist Age,
How Did Justin Foley Get Sexually Assaulted,
Articles A